In the world of science fiction, science fiction does not exist?
In the world of science fiction, science fiction does not exist.
It's an interesting concept to fathom isn't it? Think about it. It's especially prevalent in the story of Doctor Who, a time traveler who is inextricably linked to London, and England as a sort-of massive hero who shows up from time to time. In London, Doctor Who is a phenomenon that exists as a television show that started in 1963, that still airs today. Although it's gone into hiatus on occasion, to be brought back better than ever each time, it's a story and a character who has saved the British countryside from attack after attack, then bops off into the future or the past, and does it all over again. Here's the thing. It's a cultural experience that has been with Britain, and the world for decades. It's a piece of pop-culture. There it's bigger than star trek, and possibly bigger than Star Wars. Everybody has a plastic sonic screwdriver, with it's little black light on the end, and yet on the show, no one knows about Doctor Who. He's a big secret. In the world of the show, the television story does not exist. Since it happens in real time, now, we can't even pretend that, like Star Trek, it's all way in the future.
So, we have to come up with a reason why no one in England knows about this story. What else does that mean, not just in the world of science fiction, but even if you keep it tied to British science fiction, you have a real problem. In the Doctor Who special Christmas Invasion, the doctor mentions the character Arthur Dent, from the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, a series that was widely popular in Britain and in the world. He says that something is "very Arthur Dent", and calls him a nice chap. Does this, clearly a nod to Douglas Adams, and the influence that Douglas had on not only British science fiction, but Doctor Who itself as a writer and script editor in it's earlier years, turn into an acknowledgement of Arthur Dent as a good character in British science fiction that the Doctor enjoys, and he's chuckling about it, or is he acknowledging that the entire world of Douglas Adams's Hitchhiker's Guide series exists within the world of Doctor Who? Complicated sentence right? I think I've got my message across.
In a world where the Battlestar Galactica shows up on Earth in the seventies, finally having made it, and finds us unaware of the existence of ships that can travel in space that our brothers from across the stars seem to have created, what does that leave us with? I remember watching the original version of Battlestar Glactica on television, and there, when they arrive on Earth, the arrive to an Earth that hasn't just watched them on air, and to make a point that I think everyone agrees on, without the shape of Darth Vader's helmet, I don't think the Silons can exist. And at that point... in a strange sort of logic, does it mean that somewhere in the world of the original Battlestar Galactica, the world of Star Wars exists somewhere a long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away to inspire the other?
I know what you're thinking out there. Where's my suspension of disbelief?
It's wondering why Queen Elizabeth II, who I've heard takes the series DVDs of the new Doctor Who show with her on vacation, is suddenly running through Buckingham Palace, escaping with the Corgis after the Doctor calls her to warn her he's about to hit the palace with the Starship Titanic (another reference, a kiss back to Douglas Adams). In the show, though you never see her face, just her rushing feet, and a shot behind her as she waves the savior of Britain on, she's someone, a Queen Elizabeth that does not know about the television show, but instead knows the Doctor himself!
It's... A conundrum.
I have always liked the way that the comic book series Watchmen handled their own existence in conjunction with other comic books. New York is the home of a large number of super heroes (Spider-Man included) who fight crime there. In the world that the Watchmen inhabit, comic books are all centered on pirates. It becomes a splinter, or a separate world, a parallel.
So does this mean that in a parallel universe Doctor Who actually exists? I don't know, but what I do know is that science fiction, as much as I love it, leaves this question open. Maybe there's something to be said for omitting the earth all together. Star Wars is the only one that seems to co-habit without causing a lot of trouble. Being in a galaxy far far away, there's no real continuity to break.
Titles that contain the words “And The”
Does it seem odd to you that so many of the movie and book titles we cling to involve the term "and the" to connect a person with the action going on in it? Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban, all of the Harry Potters really, Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom are the ones that I can first think of off hand.
These words are so innocuous, that they are totally ignored by search engines. Looking up the term "and the" on Amazon, even restricting it to the Books section in the drop down returned to me a bunch of Samsung phones. Yahoo returned Beauty and the Beast, but not much more than that. It's such an integral part of so many titles that are important to us, but it's almost impossible to find a reference to the numbers and kinds of books and stories that employ the usage. Alvin and the Chipmunks?
I think that "and the" is the glue that holds stories to the characters that inhabit them. I think that every story title, even the clever ones, can be boiled down to one of these. Luke Skywalker and the Empire Strikes Back? Maybe Buttercup and the Dread Pirate Roberts? What about Arthur Dent and the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy? I know, way too long, even for a title that though I love it, is already way too long. The thing I'm getting at is that since every story is really about a person in a place with a problem, can't all stories be boiled down this way?
I'm not even sure that's my point.
What I am sure about is that it's an interesting way to stitch stories together.
Titles that start with the word “The”
'In the world of science fiction there lives a huge number of titles that start with the word "The." I'm considering starting a story or series with The as the title, and nothing else. That way, I figure it'll be on the beginning of all of those lists of books that come out every year with the in the title.
The Illustrated Man, The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo, The Fellowship of the Ring, The Diary of a Wimpy Kid, The Princess Bride, as examples, all too often the "The" is moved to the end of the title and appended with a comma, which never made much sense to me except that it would make the T section in the book store much too far out of proportion with the rest of the world of literature. I suppose there's also cause to think about the use of the phrase "and the" to attach a title to a character's name, but that's another thought for another day.
Something that I've often wondered when naming my own works, was should I leave "The" out of the picture? Should I avoid all the confusion that arises from where to place the word in question, to ignore it and categorize it with everything else, to include it only to see it dropped off at some point and attached with a comma to the end?
Is it worth even worrying about as an author?
It's a conundrum.
I still like the idea of titling something with just the word "The" at some point. What would that story be like?
I’m not all there myself
When I think about all the stories that have influenced me in the past, I tend to keep coming back to Alice in Wonderland. It's not really something that I plan to do, it's not really something that I actively do, it's just something that happens. Mostly it has to do with Disney's version of Alice in Wonderland, cartoon, but I do have a great love for the book, and it seems like whenever something comes up about Alice in Wonderland, people tend to ask me like I'm supposed to know something about it. So I may as well list it among the things that are bouncing around in my head that inspire me all the time.
The Cheshire cat for instance, always one of my favorite parts of either the book or the movie, the Cheshire cat sets the tone of surrealism that I've rarely seen achieved elsewhere and it's something that I would love to aspire to. I think about the Cheshire cat and I think here's a character totally designed to make you crazy, something that is in there just to test Alice's nerve. He can say one thing, and then say something totally different, and I believe he actually believes what he says each time. To him the two different realities that he describes are both absolutely valid to him in the moment he says them. In his mind the Cheshire cat can see all possible future and relate them to variant of pasts and it all makes sense to him, unless he's just stirring the pot again, trying to see how far he can push you.
Whenever the Cheshire cat shows up, Alice has to be on her guard even more than normal for such a mad world because when the Cheshire cats around he knows how to push all the buttons of all of the characters who surround him and he can do it all at the same time. We have to watch out for character like that into the protagonists because they can ruin your life very very fast, or they are too else in Wonderland can save the day at the last minute you just never know with them. It's an interesting thought when you start to consider supporting characters, because the best supporting characters seem to me to be a little bit antagonist and a little bit protagonists all of the same time a good supporting character should steal all the scenes there in and make you root for them when you know they're wrong.
When you're building a next story, heck maybe when I'm building my next story, make sure to think about the motivations of your supporting characters. If you backstab your main character; see how far you can twist the knife. And if they're there for support what they die for the hero? Somebody's got to win the best supporting actor Oscar, may as well be a character you came up with right?
